The Colonization of The Americas in the 18th Century
0As the 18th century dawned, all the world’s
eyes turned to America. Once, the resources it promised its colonial masters was its main
attraction. Now, the societies these powers had planted there rivalled or even surpassed them.
As constant warfare plunged the European nations into chaos which played out across the Atlantic,
the people of the Americas – settlers, slaves, and indigenous alike – would increasingly take
their fates into their own hands. In this video, we will see how colonisation in the Americas
after 1700 descended into chaotic warfare and violent revolution that spelled the end of
one age and the dawn of another. By 1776, the map of the American continent, and the
course of history, would be changed forever. War of the Spanish Succession The 18th century got off to an
auspicious start when every major European nation fell into a bloody
conflict over the Spanish throne. The death of Charles II of Spain in November
1700 left a succession crisis for Spain. Charles and France backed the inheritance
of 17 year old Philip of Anjou, a grandson of Louis XIV. Such a
close union between France and Spain was unacceptable to the other European
powers, especially Britain, the Dutch, and the Holy Roman Empire, triggering
the War of the Spanish Succession. Most of the fighting played out in Europe, but
by now any European war was also a colonial war, and the American theatre of the conflict became
known as Queen Anne’s War. The British with their native allies fought fiercely against the
French and Spanish with their native allies. The most significant developments of the war saw
the British capture the French province of Acadia, comprising modern day Nova Scotia, New
Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island, in 1710. Fighting ended with the Peace of Utrecht in 1713.
Philip kept his Spanish throne but lost a lot of his European territory. In the Americas, the war
had two major consequences. First, the permanent French loss of Acadia, Newfoundland, and Hudson
Day to the British, and second, the granting of the Asiento de Negras to Britain by Spain. The
asiento granted Britain the exclusive right to sell African slaves to the Spanish Empire.
Spain kept its American empire intact, but the concession reduced Spain to humiliating dependance
upon Britain for a key piece of its economy. The Iberian Powers in America Emerging from the War of Spanish Succession, Spain
had taken a beating but Philip V was secure on his throne. The war had demonstrated that Spain’s
economy and navy had fallen far behind its rivals. Philip’s long reign was one of internal reforms
to modernise and improve Spain’s government, military, and economy, which he did with
mixed success. He also pushed to expand Spain’s American Empire, especially into
Texas where San Antonio was founded in 1718. Key to Spanish imperialism across the New
World were the Jesuits. This Catholic order took the lead in missionary work and education on
Spain’s imperial frontier. Many of the frontier settlements and native outreach communities were
run by Jesuits, and they were often the main link between native subjects and colonial powers.
However, due to changing attitudes in Catholicism and controversies about Jesuit power, the Jesuits
fell out of favour with Catholic Europe by the mid-18th century. In 1750 as part of the Treaty
of Madrid, Spain tried to exchange several Jesuit mission communities in Paraguay with Portugal
for more valuable territory. The Jesuits, angry at being abandoned and with strong influence over
the native Guarani, incited the Guarani to rebel. The Guarani Wars saw Portugal and Spain team up
for several years to suppress the local revolt, and when all was said and done they laid
the blame firmly on the Jesuits. In 1767, they were expelled from all parts of the
empire and their property seized by the crown. In the long-run, this would be disastrous for
Spanish-native relations and would contribute to the weakening of Spanish imperial authority
that would eventually allow for independence. There were other signs of weakness too. The gold
and silver mines of Peru, which had made Spanish colonization so profitable at first, were drying
up by the mid-18th century. The native Inca were also restless with dozens of localised rebellions
against Spanish rule that caused much anxiety and disruption. Peru’s wealth and importance
declined in turn, and focus shifted to other areas of colonisation. As if to prove this,
in 1776, the territory of Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, and most of Chile was split
off from the declining Viceroyalty of Peru and reorganised into the Viceroyalty of Rio de la
Plata. Spain also tried to compensate for its imperial decline with California, which saw its
first major settlements at San Diego in 1769, Los Angele in 1771, and San Francisco in 1776,
but Spanish settlement there was always an afterthought and they never did discover the gold
that would one day make the region so prosperous. Things were a bit more stable for Portugal
who avoided getting embroiled in most of the colonial wars in the Americas. Its secure
position down in Brazil and lack of ambition elsewhere minimised conflicts with Britain,
France, and Spain. The Treaty of Madrid in 1750 firmly recognised Portuguese and
Spanish interests in South America, reducing the risk of conflict even more.
As a result, Portuguese colonial affairs were relatively low-key compared to the
history-shaping events going on elsewhere. The discovery of gold had triggered a gold
rush in the early 18th century that dominated affairs in Brazil. The discovery of diamonds in
1729 only reinforced the pivot away from sugar, the centre of which had now shifted
to the Caribbean, in favour of mining. Reflecting this shift, the colonial capital
moved from Salvador to Rio de Janeiro in 1763 to be closer to the mining areas. These mines had
no less need for slaves than the plantations did. Brazil continued to be the primary destination
for African slaves heading to the New World, with almost 2 million of them imported
to Brazil over the 18th century. This continued expansion of the African
population prompted harsher racial laws to rigidly define racial hierarchy:
Europeans at the top, mesticos below, Africans below that, and the indigenous peoples
last of all. Portuguese attempts to forcibly subjugate this dwindling indigenous population, as
expressed through the laws of 1757, only further destroyed indigenous communities with violence,
forced resettlement, and legal discrimination. Life in the North American Colonies But the pivotal events of this
period would come from the north, so let’s pivot back to the British. The early 18th century was the Golden
Age of Britain’s American Empire, but the cracks that would break it were
already visible. Each British colony had different government arrangements.
Each colony’s assembly and governor, if they had either, could expect different
powers and privileges. While Britain tried to assert more centralised control
through royal governors, realities on the ground prevented the establishment of a
consistent administrative structureFor example, the Crown could disallow most colonial laws, but
not those of Connecticut or Rhode Island. Royal Governors regularly butted heads with the elected
colonial assemblies who each saw their legitimacy drawn from different sources – the former
from the Crown, the latter from the people. These inconsistent governing arrangements were
a nuisance. Take for example the founding of Britain’s 13th American colony in Georgia in
1732. Initially controlled by a board of trustees, the state had no single governor and no right to
an elected assembly. The leader of the trustees, James Oglethorpe, envisioned it as a settler
colony for debtors and convicts who could be granted small parcels of land by the trustees. It
was also conveniently placed to act as a buffer between South Carolina and Spanish Florida.
Most settlers ended up being regular colonists, not convicts, and for some reason they
weren’t happy with the prospect of being human shields for Carolina on tiny portions
of land with no right to representation. The Georgia colonists complained relentlessly and
frequently defied the trustees. Eventually, the trustees gave up and handed over the colony
to the crown to be its problem instead. Conflict with native groups was also
a persistent problem. In Carolina, war with indigenous peoples coupled with drought
and local unrest raised the possibility of abandoning the territory entirely. In the
end, the ruling proprietors chose to sell North Carolina back to the crown while keeping
South Carolina with its valuable plantations. The South Carolinans dug in and waged their own
war against local indigenous groups. With the support of the Cherokee, the South Carolinians
brutally suppressed the Yamasee, the Creeks, and the Tuscarora, virtually purging Carolina
of those groups, but at the cost of about 7% of the white population. The Tuscarora were
forced to flee north where they sought sanctuary with the Iroquois, who admitted
them as the 6th nation in their Confederacy, much to the anger of the French and English who
knew the Tuscarora had no love for Europeans. Regional problems aside, the picture for the
American Colonies was still very positive. The population was growing rapidly from about
210,000 in 1690, to 445,000 in 1720, and 1.2 million by 1750. Most of this growth was natural
reproduction rather than immigration. For example, while only 19% of Chesapeake Bay’s white
population had been born there in 1668, it was 90% by 1750. These growing colonies began
spreading inland too, with the first European settlers heading into the Shenandoah Valley
and opening the doorway for further westward settlement in the late 18th and early 19th
century. Then there were the cities like New York, Boston, and Philadelphia which could support
ever larger populations thanks to the prosperous agriculture around them. By the mid-18th century,
around 10% of Americans were city dwellers, a sharp increase from early colonial days
and a number that would only keep rising. Moreover, it was a good life. The average
white American settler could expect to own more land than a European, pay less tax
than a European, and have a greater say in government affairs than a European – as
long as they were a white male, of course. While European cities were piecemeal
evolutions stretching back centuries, American cities were modern constructs
often built to a plan and integrated with modern conveniences like pavements, libraries, and
large ports befitting of a modern trading nation. It is no wonder that many Americans had come to
believe that life in the colonies was far superior in many measures than life in Europe. This was
certainly the opinion of Benjamin Franklin who wrote with pride that “every man in New England
has a vote in public affairs, lives in a tidy, warm house, and has plenty of good food and
fuel.” Still,he conceded that the Americans were lacking to their English brethren in
matters of manners, etiquette, and virtue. This, however, was a problem Franklin did his
fair share in addressing through the foundation of newspapers, colleges, and philosophical
societies in his native Philadelphia. Resistance to Colonisation Of course, there were plenty of slaves who would
not paint such a rosy picture of American life. By 1750 there were around 250,000 slaves
in the 13 North American colonies, mostly in Carolina, Georgia, Maryland,
and Virginia. These slaves experienced harsh legal discrimination with slim
prospects of ever buying their freedom. The small free Black population was a distant
aspiration for the average slave, and many of those free Blacks secured their status through
their own participation in slave exploitation. Slave resistance was common. Attempted escapes,
work avoidance, and other small-scale refusal to accept their condition was to be expected, but
large-scale slave revolts were rare. When they did happen, they were usually brief and
bloody for everyone involved. The Stono Rebellion of 1739 is a perfect example. Led
by the literate slave Jeremy Stono, several dozen slaves mostly of Angolan origin set
out from the Stono River in South Carolina in a desperate march towards Spanish Florida where
all escaped British slaves were promised amnesty. The escaping slaves killed several dozen whites
along the way before being intercepted by slave catchers at the Edisto River. Most of the rebel
slaves went down fighting, including Jeremy Cato. The most consistently effective slave resistance
was found down in the Caribbean, especially in Jamaica, where escaped slaves managed to form
maroon societies in the interior which resisted British efforts to recapture them. Between 1728
and 1740, the Jamaican maroons under Captain Cudjoe in the West and Nanny in the East managed
to successfully fend off British troops until the British were forced to recognise their nominal
independence. The British agreed to leave the maroons alone, so long as the maroons stopped
raiding plantations or helping slaves escape. That was great news for the maroons but
meant little to the massive slave population who remained. By 1763, an estimated one in five
people in British controlled America was enslaved, and that number was at least as high if not higher
when taking the Americas as a whole. The slaves in the Caribbean colonies were producing over
41,000 tons of sugar by the middle of the century, filling the pockets of their colonial
masters and leaving nothing for themselves. War in the Colonies With so much valuable trade and
so many ambitious European powers, America could prove the sources of conflicts
just as much as conditions back in Europe could. For example, in 1731, a Spanish coast guard ship
in the Caribbean captured the English Captain Robert Jenkins and sliced off his ear. The wounded
Captain took his pickled ear back to Parliament, who eventually seized upon the attack to assemble
a fleet to sail against Spanish America. The War of Jenkins’ Ear did not erupt until 1739, and
the ear was more of a publicity slogan to mask the real concerns over trade in the Caribbean.
Still, this new wave of conflict saw tens of thousands of casualties. The most significant
episode of the war was the British attack on Cartagena in Columbia in 1741. The British
force, composed mostly of American colonists, suffered tremendous casualties in the campaign
and lost most of their men to disease or combat. The War of Jenkins’ Ear dovetailed into yet
another major European conflict in the War of the Austrian Succession. Another chaotic
inheritance dispute that managed to draw in almost every major European power, it played out
in America as King George’s War. Again, colonial troops and native allies were essential to the
fighting. It was a force of mostly New England volunteers who won Britain’s most important
victory at the Battle of Louisbourg in 1745, cutting off French access to the Saint
Lawrence River, and indigenous allies made up the backbone of French raids into New
York and Massachusetts. As much as 8% of Massachusetts’ male population was lost between
the War of Jenkins’ Ear and King George’s War. The war ended with the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle
in 1748 with no major territorial changes. Louisbourg was handed back to France, much to
the anger of the American colonists who had fought and died for it. But what the colonists
wanted didn’t really matter to Britain, who was happy to exchange it for control of the city of
Madras over in India. A good deal for the British Empire but not for the Americans, who found that
their sacrifices had been betrayed in the name of imperial ambition. This disconnect between colony
and imperial master would only keep growing. The Collapse of New France The war was a blow for France who had opened
the 18th century with a vast American empire and everything to play for. New France stretched
from Montreal to the mouth of the Mississippi, and the French consistently planted
new settlements across its breadth, from Detroit in 1701 to New Orleans in 1718. While the Wars of Spanish and Austrian Succession
shaped relations with European powers, relations with indigenous peoples proved to be just as
important for the French. The French continued their efforts to ally, incite, remove, or
destroy native groups as it saw fit. For example, in 1722 the French missionary Sebastian Raele
who worked among the Wabanaki of New Hampshire incited them to rebel against the British
settlers. France was angry about border disputes left over from the Peace of Utrecht in
1713 and realised that the Wabanaki would make a useful weapon against New England. The conflict
raged for 3 years and claimed hundreds of lives. In other places, the French found themselves
on the receiving end of native resistance. In November 1729 for example, French colonists at
Fort Rosalie in Mississippi were attacked by the Natchez after years of declining relations. The
Natchez killed all of the men but spared the women and slaves before burning the settlement to the
ground. Believing a native revolt was imminent, French authorities in New Orleans dispatched
soldiers to destroy nearby native villages, even though most had nothing to do with the attack.
The Natchez were eventually scattered, with many of them seeking shelter with the Chickasaw in the
Lower Mississippi Valley. The French continued to wage warfare against the Chickasaw, Natchez, and
other native groups, many of whom receded support from the British, while using their own native
allies like the Choctaw, well into the 1750s. However, the fate of French
colonisation in Louisiana would ultimately be decided
by events far to the north. On May 28th 1754, the Governor of Virginia
dispatched a young officer named George Washington to push away a French garrison from the
headwaters of the Ohio River. What was supposed to be a simple clearing mission descended into
a skirmish which left a dozen men dead. When word spread of the encounter, both Britain
and France escalated their military efforts and began preparing expeditions against each
other. Washington had unintentionally triggered what would later be dubbed the French and Indian
War. When another major European war broke out in 1756 over Austrian territorial claims, Britain
and France merely continued their conflict. The wider 7 Years War pitted Britain,
Prussia, and Portugal against France, Spain, Austria, Russia, and Sweden, among
others, and naturally the war came to the Americans with the European powers
and their native allies trading blows. Initially, France got the better of the fighting
in North America. The situation was so concerning that in June 1754, representatives from 7
American colonies – New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and
New Hampshire – met at Albany to discuss plans for their own defence and possible
alliances with the Indians should France invade. The Albany Congress was the first
time that representatives of multiple colonies had gathered together on their
own initiative to direct their own affairs. This was no independence meeting, but some of its
attendees like Pennsylvania’s Benjamin Franklin would remember how effective such a model of
colonial cooperation was in years to come. Britain’s military fortunes recovered as the
war continued through the late 1750s. In 1759, they went on the offensive, sailing an
army up the Saint Lawrence River and laying siege to Quebec City which
fell in September that year. In 1760, they marched west and wrested control of
Montreal from France as well. Britain’s gains in Canada and events back in Europe
secured its victory in the war by 1763. The resulting Treaty of Paris was the death knell for
France’s American Empire. Britain would keep all of France’s old Canadian territory and its 100,000
inhabitants. Meanwhile French Louisiana was split. Everything west of the Mississippi went to
Spain, while everything east went to Britain including Spanish Florida. Aside from a handful of
small islands, France’s American empire was over. However, Britain would not have too long to celebrate this victory before
it too faced colonial collapse. The Path to Revolution Britain’s victory in the Seven Years’ War
was expensive in both money and manpower. War debt sat at £161 million and much of the
fighting in America had been done by American colonists who felt unappreciated by the crown.
Britain also now faced the cost and challenge of managing an expanded American Empire. As
well as dealing with an unhappily occupied French population – many would be deported
from Acadia to Louisiana where they became the Cajuns – Britain also had to deal with new
waves of native resistance. Conflict with the Cherokee in Carolina in the 1760s and the
Great Northern Indian Uprising of 1763, which saw a coalition of native groups come
together to oppose Britain’s new dominance, proved that Britain was still in desperate need
of money and manpower to secure its empire. King George III felt that the American
colonies should pay their fair share for this. The Sugar Act of 1764 marked the first
of a series of taxes and duties imposed upon the American colonists to meet this
goal. However, Britain had underestimated the confidence and resistance of the colonies.
The imposition of even a relatively small tax against their wishes triggered unexpectedly
intense resistance from the colonists. They objected to the taxes being imposed upon them
by Parliament which they had no representation in. Britain ignored the initial objections and pressed
on with the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Duties of 1767 imposed upon a variety of goods.
All together, the new taxes weren’t actually that much. The typical American colonist was still
taxed less and experienced less government control than virtually anyone in Europe at the time.
However, a fiercely independent colonial spirit had emerged. Wealthy, stable, and confident, many
of the colonists felt like they had surpassed Britain and resented the mother country imposing
anything on them. Protests mounted and Britain was forced to send troops into American cities to keep
order. On March 5th 1770, this decision turned to tragedy in Boston when British troops opened
fire on unarmed protestors, killing 5 people. Discontent was now turning to anger. The
Tea Act of 1773 was designed to limit the trade of smuggled tea and boost revenue
for the struggling East India Company. Instead, it convinced anti-British leaders in
Boston to march aboard company ships and dump £10,000 of tea into Boston Harbour. In response,
Britain closed down all the ports. This had the obvious effect of angering anyone dependent
upon trade and fuelled anti-British feeling. By now, assemblies and elites across the
colony were urging support for Boston and calls for full-blown revolt were mounting. In
1774, a Continental Congress modelled after the Albany conference of 1754 brought 12 of
the 13 American colonies together to demand a boycott of all British goods. The imposition
of more strict laws curtailing colonial freedom, known to the Americans as the Intolerable
Acts, was the breaking point. Negotiation and peaceful protest had failed, and the
militias were America’s only alternative. In April 1775, British troops met American rebels
at the Battles of Lexington and Concord. The first engagement of the Revolutionary War went in favour
of the British, as did the second at Bunker Hill in June, but Britain’s victories only seemed to
unify the colonists against it. The Americans tried and failed to incite Canada to join the
rebellion, losing 500 men to a disastrous Quebec expedition in December1775, but that did not
deter the rest of the American colonies. On July 4th 1776, the Continental Congress issued their
Declaration of Independence, ushering in a new age of American history. It would take until 1783
for the United States to secure this independence through force of arms, but it would look back
at 1776 as the moment the country was born. For better or for worse, by 1776 the colonisation
of the Americas had resulted in the birth of a new nation that would go on to shape world
history. The independence of the United States foreshadowed the collapse of most European
colonial empires. Over the next few decades, most of the rest of the Americas from Brazil to
Bolivia would throw off European colonial rule and usher in a new age of American independence.
It was, of course, an independence for the European settler communities who had conquered,
displaced, or subsumed the indigenous peoples who had called the land home when Columbus made
landfall not 300 years before. Colonisation had irreversibly changed the Americas, and
like it or not, there was no turning back.